MSI K8T Neo: BIOS and Overclocking

MSI uses AMI BIOS on the K8T Neo, but the look and feel of the BIOS options in this AMI BIOS are almost exactly like a Phoenix-Award BIOS. A full range of overclocking options are available, including adjustable CPU voltage, memory voltage, and AGP voltage. A full range of memory timings are available, including the ability to set CAS 2, 2.5, or 3.0 timings. Memory Timings worked well. We could find no option at all in the MSI BIOS to set AGP/PCI lock, which will become a very important option since we cannot set CPU multipliers on Athlon64. We contacted MSI, who told us this will be included in an upcoming BIOS upgrade. Other than the missing and critical AGP/PCI lock, the rest of the BIOS offered a full range of options for tweaking the system for best performance.

As with other tested Athlon64 boards, we did not find a provision for multiplier adjustments in the K8T Neo BIOS. This makes the AGP/PCI lock particularly important, since high settings of the FSB will be the only available means of overclocking — the same as what we currently see on the Pentium 4 chips.

FSB Overclocking Results

Without a PCI/AGP lock in the pre-release BIOS, we made no serious attempt to overclock the K8-800T. We did find that we could boot with reasonable stability at a maximum setting of 219 using either an IDE or a SATA hard drive connected to the VIA SATA controller. This is quite different from Intel SATA, where SATA must be set at 200 or the system will not boot. We will explore this important subject of overclocking the MSI K8T Neo in our upcoming Athlon64 motherboard roundup. We are looking for more answers regarding PCI/AGP lock on VIA K8T800, since VIA has not offered the PCI/AGP lock option on recent VIA chipsets.

MSI K8T Neo: Basic Features MSI K8T Neo: Memory Testing
Comments Locked

12 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Friday, September 26, 2003 - link

    #5
    I old too, but still keep buing from AMD, Intel is way too expensive for as in Latin America, and give no clear advantage for a programmer/gamer like me.
    If you been having problems with AMD, surely your are building AMD chips with PCCHIPs mainboards, and Pentiums with Intel boards, you are a smart guy!
    So, if you gonna build a modern PC, you'll experience problems becouse WinXP didn't include drivers for new chipsets, so, for it all going like a charm, you need an Intel Pentium III and a Intel 2001's mainboard, anything newer, you gonna have to look for drivers, whatever the platform you choose.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    #10 -
    You are absolutely correct in theory. However, when we moved from the Ti4600 to the ATI 9800 PRO, our encoding scores on the P4 went up about 35-45%. Don't ask me why. They did not change on the Athlon, which had led in this area before. That is one of several reasons we will be changing to another encoding benchmark.

    If you doubt what I say, check Evan's 20-board 865/875 roundup done with the Ti 4600, then check the retest of some of the top boards we include in our more recent P4 reviews. Evan did the original and the update tests, and I have confirmed his results.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Since when does the video card have ANYTHING to do with DivX encoding? That is a purely CPU and RAM issue, even playback is not influenced too much by the video card anymore (speed not quality...that is an entirely different issue).
  • Zoomer - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Hey, could you please touch on what DAC chip is powering these setups? A picture would be nice too.

    Envy 24bit audio would be an utter waste if some crap Realtek codec was used. It would be good if this was highlighted so that motherboard manufacturers catering to the higher end of the market will take notice.

    Chaintech apparantly took note of the fact that you guys bashed every single board that had the ATX connector near the board i/o ports. Despite it being a non issue. That thick bundle can be routed so that the interference with airflow is minimised.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 24, 2003 - link

    Please, please, please stop using Flash for graphs.
  • dvinnen - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    #5: Youe funny. Constant screw ups? It's Intell who has had to have 3 or so recalls over the last 4-5 years. And theres that bug with the Itantic which the only way to fix is to lower the clock to 800 mhz. AMD is the one who keeps screwing up?
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    #3 and #4 - Thank you. Now corrected.

    Just before posting we decided to combine the 3 reviews into one larger launch review. Unfortunately I had used the same name for two different pictures and the first one was picked up. There is a socket closeup of the FIC that never made it to the server.
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    yeah, about the only good thing coming out of this is the price drops soon. Otherwise still the same stupid +-5FPS differences = waste of time/effert to get excited about.

    i used to love amd, but just got tired of their constant screw ups, so anymore i personally don't care what stupid thing they come out with, i won't waste my time with it.

    Perhaps that's cuz i'm older now and have a good job/salary and don't need/care about overclocking and or paying a few bucks more for intel quality/stability. yeah, must be just getting to be an old fogey, cuz this whole amd/intel wanna-be-war doesn't give me a hardon like it used to ;)
  • Thoreau - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    Correction, Page 11 in the index list. First pic.
  • Thoreau - Tuesday, September 23, 2003 - link

    The 2nd page of the FIC section shows a pic from the Chaintech board. Think you got that a little mixed up there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now