Performance Analysis

In this section the XP333-R was tested with FSB and memory both set to 133MHz.

Quake III Arena


Quake 3 Arena (FPS)
ABIT KR7-RAID

ASUS A7V266-E

Gigabyte 7VTXH

DFI AD70-SR

Soltek SL-75DRV2

EPoX 8KHA+

ECS K7VTA3

Soyo SY-K7V Dragon Plus!

Shuttle AK35GTR

Chaintech CT-7VJDA

Transcend TS-AKR4

ASUS A7A266-E

FIC AN11

Iwill XP333-R

MSI KT266 Pro2

AOpen AK77 Plus

226.1

225.9

224.8

224.3

224.1

223.6

223.4

223.1

223.1

222.7

222.5

222.4

221.9

221.6

221.5

220.4

|
0
|
45
|
90
|
136
|
181
|
226
|
271

Here we can see that all the KT266A boards are very matured already as we are dealing with an intangible 2.6% difference between the fastest and the slowest board. You can also see that the ASUS A7A266-E and the Iwill XP333-R, the two boards with the ALi MaGiK 1 chipset, are a bit slower.

SYSMark 2000


SYSMark 2000
ASUS A7V266-E

ABIT KR7-RAID

Shuttle AK35GTR

Soltek SL-75DRV2

Gigabyte 7VTXH

EPoX 8KHA+

ECS K7VTA3

DFI AD70-SR

ASUS A7A266-E

Soyo SY-K7V Dragon Plus!

Iwill XP333-R

FIC AN11

Chaintech CT-7VJDA

Transcend TS-AKR4

MSI KT266 Pro2

AOpen AK77 Plus

309

309

308

307

307

307

307

307

307

306

306

306

306

305

305

305

|
0
|
62
|
124
|
185
|
247
|
309
|
371

In SYSMark 2000 the performance gap is even narrower. With just 1.3% between the fastest and the slowest, we can say that the boards perform very close to each other in real world.

Winstone 2002


Content Creation Winstone 2001
ASUS A7A266-E

ASUS A7V266-E

ABIT KR7-RAID

Shuttle AK35GTR

Soltek SL-75DRV2

Gigabyte 7VTXH

EPoX 8KHA+

FIC AN11

DFI AD70-SR

Iwill XP333-R

MSI KT266 Pro2

ECS K7VTA3

Soyo SY-K7V Dragon Plus!

AOpen AK77 Plus

Chaintech CT-7VJDA

Transcend TS-AKR4

32.4

32.3

32.1

31.7

31.7

31.6

31.3

31.3

31.2

31.2

31

30.9

30.9

30.8

30.8

30.5

|
0
|
6
|
13
|
19
|
26
|
32
|
39

Here we finally see some difference. The Winstone 2002 is a more stressful benchmark and it is much more memory intensive than the other benchmarks. Although the boards still compete pretty close to each other, the performance difference is now 6.5%.

You can also see that the ASUS A7A266-E and the Iwill XP333-R jump out a bit and perform faster than the other KT266A boards.

The Test Overclocking the Iwill XP333-R
Comments Locked

3 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Monday, September 29, 2003 - link

    How do I get my Engine to Memory clock to run synchronous for my Epox 8kha+ board
  • xrror - Saturday, August 14, 2021 - link

    This was such an exciting time in PC hardware. Intel was still trying to cram Rambus down the industry's throat - and obstinately trying to strong arm the mobo makers and force chipset makers to Rambus licensing. We still had VIA, SiS, ULi, and even nVidia in the chipset market, and with AMD's Athlon line still extraordinarily competitive and Intel in full attack they could no longer just consider AMD as a side-show - this was their leverage against Intel and they had to treat Socket A as premium platform.
  • NegativeROG - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    I still have this board. AND, I invested all of a $10,000 inheritance in Rambus RDRAM. I'm smarter now (I hope). But, you are right about exciting times in the PC space. I navigated away from AMD for a bit, but came back, and will stay forever. Team RED!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now